Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-337
23-ORD-337 December 18, 2023 In re: Bradley Morris/Mayfield Police Department Summary: The Office cannot find that the Mayfield Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the …
Bradley Morris — Mayfield Police Department
Opinion —
OAG 23-09
Commonwealth of Kentucky Office of the Attorney General Daniel Cameron Attorney General Capitol Building, Suite 118 700 Capital Avenue Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 (502) 696-5300 Fax: (502) 564-2894 December 18, 2023 OAG 23-09 Subject: A county’s …
Opinion —
OAG 23-10
Commonwealth of Kentucky Office of the Attorney General Daniel Cameron Attorney General Capitol Building, Suite 118 700 Capital Avenue Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 (502) 696-5300 Fax: (502) 564-2894 December 19, 2023 OAG 23-10 Subject: Whether the term …
Opinion —
OAG 23-11
Commonwealth of Kentucky Office of the Attorney General Daniel Cameron Attorney General Capitol Building, Suite 118 700 Capital Avenue Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 (502) 696-5300 Fax: (502) 564-2894 December 19, 2023 OAG 23 - 11 Subject: Whether …
23-ORD-345
23-ORD-345 December 28, 2023 In re: Kenneth Tracy/City of Frankfort Summary: The City of Frankfort (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records without explaining how the exception on which it relied …
Kenneth Tracy — City of Frankfort
23-ORD-344
23-ORD-344 December 28, 2023 In re: Joshua Powell/Hardin County Detention Center Summary: The Hardin County Detention Center (“the Jail”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for copies of inmate recordings that …
Joshua Powell — Hardin County Detention Center
23-ORD-346
23-ORD-346 December 28, 2023 In re: Nicolas Horne/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to …
Nicolas Horne — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-349
23-ORD-349 December 28, 2023 In re: Craig D. Miller/University of Kentucky Summary: The University of Kentucky (“the University”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request that failed to “precisely describe” public …
Craig D. Miller — University of Kentucky
23-ORD-348
23-ORD-348 December 28, 2023 In re: John Cheves/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it sought …
John Cheves — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-350
23-ORD-350 December 28, 2023 In re: Gerald Chapman/Daviess County Public Library Summary: The Daviess County Public Library (“the Library”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided all responsive records in its custody or …
Gerald Chapman — Daviess County Public Library
23-ORD-343
23-ORD-343 December 28, 2023 In re: Anne Coorssen/Oldham County Schools Summary: Oldham County Schools (“the District”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it invoked KRS 61.872(5) to delay access to records without providing a detailed …
Anne Coorssen — Oldham County Schools
23-ORD-347
23-ORD-347 December 28, 2023 In re: Jerry D. Lotz/Louisville Metro Department of Corrections Summary: Louisville Metro Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request …
Jerry D. Lotz — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
23-ORD-315
23-ORD-315 November 30, 2023 In re: Shari Morris/Barren County Detention Center Summary: The Barren County Detention Center (“Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a portion of the request that sought information …
Shari Morris — Barren County Detention Center
24-ORD-001
24-ORD-001 January 12, 2024 In re: Jerry Shrecker/City of Owensboro Summary: The Office cannot find that the City of Owensboro (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request it did not receive as a …
Jerry Shrecker — City of Owensboro
24-ORD-002
24-ORD-002 January 16, 2024 In re: Daniel Owens/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it entirely withheld from an unsuccessful …
Daniel Owens — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
24-ORD-003
24-ORD-003 January 16, 2024 In re: Timothy D. Day/Kentucky Parole Board Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky Parole Board (“the Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not exist. …
Timothy D. Day — Kentucky Parole Board
24-ORD-004
24-ORD-004 January 16, 2024 In re: Davon Burke/Kenton County Attorney’s Office Summary: Because a person seeking the Attorney General’s review of a denial of a request to inspect records must provide “a copy of the written request and a copy of the …
Davon Burke — Kenton County Attorney’s Office
24-ORD-006
24-ORD-006 January 16, 2024 In re: Reginald Grider/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“Penitentiary”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its …
Reginald Grider — Kentucky State Penitentiary
24-ORD-005
24-ORD-005 January 16, 2024 In re: Anthony Cain/Calloway County Jail Summary: The Calloway County Jail (“Jail”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records Decision Inmate Anthony …
Anthony Cain — Calloway County Jail
24-ORD-013
24-ORD-013 January 17, 2024 In re: Monty Corbett/Breathitt–Wolfe EMS, Inc. Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Breathitt–Wolfe EMS, Inc. (“the Corporation”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to find …
Monty Corbett — Breathitt–Wolfe EMS, Inc.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.