Skip to main content
09-OMD-132 is distinguished from the current case because in 09-OMD-132, the appellant submitted his complaint to the appropriate presiding officer and the board failed to respond, whereas in the current case, the complaint was not submitted to the correct presiding officer.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Cited
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.