03-OMD-250 is cited to support the reasoning that the discretion of determining a conspicuous place for posting notices rests with the public agency, unless there is evidence of an attempt to conceal the notice. This decision is used to justify the conclusion that the Fiscal Court did not violate the Open Meetings Act by posting the notice in the meeting room's bulletin board, despite it not being the most conspicuous place available.
03-OMD-250 was Followed by 10-OMD-135
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog. (coming soon)
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.