This case is cited to support the argument that discussions with an attorney about constitutional requirements do not necessarily fall within the litigation exception of the Open Meetings Act. It is used to argue against the Council's justification for their closed session.
03-OMD-178 was Cited by 04-OMD-039
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.