This case is cited to support the finding that there was no violation of the Open Meetings Act when there is no evidence of secret meetings or a series of meetings designed to circumvent the Act. It is used to argue that the Council did not violate the Act as there was no proof of a quorum discussing public business in private.
02-OMD-107 was Followed by 04-OMD-039
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.