This case is cited to support the decision's reasoning that a complaint must clearly state the circumstances constituting an alleged violation of the Open Meetings Act, as required by KRS 61.846(1). The decision follows the precedent set in 13-OMD-037 where the Attorney General refused to consider arguments due to the lack of a properly stated complaint.
13-OMD-037 was Followed by 13-OMD-079
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog. (coming soon)
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.