This case is cited to illustrate that discussions about reorganization proposals that might lead to the dismissal of a CEO were improperly held in closed session because the CEO's reputational interest was not directly implicated. The decision follows this precedent in determining that discussions not directly related to the appointment, discipline, or dismissal of an individual employee are not permissible in closed session.
03-OMD-089 was Followed by 12-OMD-118
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.