Skip to main content
04-ORD-123 is cited to support the argument that public records maintained by a private individual on behalf of a public agency must still be produced for public inspection. The decision draws a parallel to a previous case where city records were held by a contract attorney and were required to be made available at city premises, emphasizing that the location of records does not exempt an agency from its obligations under the Open Records Act.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Cited
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.