Skip to main content

Request By:
Sarah Berkshire
Staff Writer
The News-Enterprise
408 West Dixie Avenue
Elizabethtown, KY 42701Richard Hughes, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Hardin County Schools
65 W.A. Jenkins Road
Elizabethtown, KY 42701-8452Michael A. Pike
SKEETERS, BENNETT & WILSON
Attorneys at Law
550 W. Lincoln Trail Blvd.
Radcliff, KY 40160

Opinion

Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

At issue in this appeal is whether the Hardin County Schools violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in denying the request submitted by Sarah Berkshire, Staff Writer for The News-Enterprise , to inspect the "job performance evaluation, including any written recommendations for improvement" of Paul Connelly, former principal at East Hardin Middle School. In keeping with a line of decisions dating back to 1977, this office affirms the denial of Ms. Berkshire's request by the Hardin County Schools based upon KRS 61.878(1)(a).

By letter directed to Superintendent Richard Hughes, Ed.D, on November 22, 2005, Ms. Berkshire requested access to the following:

1. Mr. Connelly's last job performance evaluation, including any written recommendations for improvement.

2. Any survey or written feedback from employees of East Hardin Middle School or the Hardin County School[s] central office concerning Mr. Connelly's performance as a supervisor.

3. Any correspondence from the superintendent to Mr. Connelly concerning his employment as principal of East Hardin Middle School.

4. Any correspondence from the superintendent to cabinet members concerning Mr. Connelly's employment as principal at East Hardin Middle School.

In a timely written response, Superintendent Hughes characterized the request for Mr. Connelly's performance evaluation as "a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy as defined under KRS 61.878(1)(a)." As further observed by Superintendent Hughes, items "related to job performance or evaluation are exempt." According to Superintendent Hughes, there "is not any survey or written feedback. " 1 In conclusion, Superintendent Hughes advised Ms. Berkshire that copies of the "letter of transfer with personal information redacted in accordance with KRS 61.878(1)(a)" and responsive e-mails were enclosed for review.

By letter directed to this office on November 29, 2005, Ms. Berkshire initiated this appeal from Superintendent Hughes' "refusal" to disclose the requested performance evaluation, arguing that "inspection of the records is warranted" because Mr. Connelly was "transferred to a position he did not want." Ms. Berkshire believes the performance evaluation "will reveal the reason for the transfer." In her view, Mr. Connelly's job performance is not a personal matter since he was "the leader of a public school." Because Ms. Berkshire does not otherwise challenge Superintendent Hughes' response, this office assumes that she is satisfied with the records provided; any issues related to those records are therefore moot. 2 Accordingly, the sole issue on appeal is whether the Hardin County Schools properly relied upon KRS 61.878(1)(a) in denying The News-Enterprise access to Mr. Connelly's performance evaluation.

Upon receiving notification of Ms. Berkshire's appeal from this office, Michael A. Pike, attorney, responded on behalf of the Hardin County Schools. To begin, Mr. Pike contends the evaluations at issue "are in the nature of preliminary memoranda in which opinions are expressed and recommendations made, and thus qualify for exclusion pursuant to KRS 61.878(1)(j)." Citing 00 ORD-177, Mr. Pike characterizes the evaluations as "'tools which a public employee or officer uses in hammering out official action within the function of his office.'" Id., citing OAG 78-626, p. 2. 3

As correctly observed by Mr. Pike, in a line of decisions "dating back nearly thirty years" the Attorney General has held that the privacy rights of public employees "in information of a personal nature appearing in a performance evaluation outweigh the public's interest in disclosure of the evaluation. See 96-ORD-51; 96-ORD-275; 99-ORD-14; and 99-ORD-42." Relying upon 92-ORD-1145, in which the Attorney General declared that the performance evaluation of a school system superintendent was subject to disclosure, and 00-ORD-177, in which this office found the performance evaluation of the Henderson City Manager to be nonexempt, Mr. Pike notes the commonality among those decisions was that both individuals were "ultimately responsible for the management" of the agencies they served. Accordingly, the interest of the public in viewing their performance evaluations outweighed "the individual privacy rights of the particular managers. " Distinguishing this case, Mr. Pike correctly argues that Mr. Connelly, as the former principal of East Hardin Middle School, does not fall within this category. To the contrary, the evaluation at issue contains information "'of a uniquely sensitive or personal character as to implicate privacy considerations'" for the employee, Mr. Connelly. See 00-ORD-177.

In short, the position taken by the Hardin County Schools is consistent with a long line of decisions issued by this office. OAG 77-394; OAG 79-348; OAG 80-58; OAG 82-204; OAG 86-15; OAG 89-90; 92-ORD-1375; 94-ORD-54; 94-ORD-132; 96-ORD-51; 96-ORD-256; 96-ORD-275; 99-ORD-14; 99-ORD-41; 02ORD-197; 04-ORD-045. As noted by Mr. Pike, the Attorney General departed from this position in 92-ORD-1145, declaring that the performance evaluation of a school system superintendent was subject to disclosure; this decision was premised upon the notion that the interest of the public in reviewing those portions of the superintendent's evaluation which "have a direct bearing on the management of the school system is superior to the reduced expectation of privacy" the superintendent might have with respect to the record. 00-ORD-177, p. 6.

In expressly declining to extend this reasoning to rank and file employees, this office observed:

We do not, in so holding, establish a rule of general application vis-a-vis performance evaluations. Nor do we depart from any opinion previously issued by this Office. [Footnote omitted.] Because the Superintendent is ultimately responsible for the management of the school system, his performance is of far greater interest to the public, and his expectation of privacy in the evaluation of that performance is correspondingly reduced. The same cannot be said of the other employees of a school system or any other public agency, since disclosure of their evaluations may spur unhealthy comparisons, breeding discord in the [workplace], and result in injury and embarrassment to the employee. We continue to ascribe to the view that an employee's right of privacy in his evaluation is superior to the public's interest in inspecting that evaluation. Our decision is limited to the facts presented in this case.

92-ORD-1145, p. 4. See 99-ORD-128 (recognizing that "both the evaluator and the person being evaluated have a substantial privacy interest in the evaluation that generally outweighs the public interest" in disclosure of the record for this reason); 04-ORD-045. Of particular relevance here, the Attorney General later adopted the reasoning of 92-ORD-1145 in upholding the denial by the Barren County Schools Superintendent of a request for the evaluations of each principal in the school district. 96-ORD-256, p. 1. Because the instant appeal presents no reason to depart from this approach, the same outcome necessarily follows. In our view, 02-ORD-197, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling on the facts presented. Although Mr. Connelly was not a "rank and file employee," he was not " the individual[] who [was] 'ultimately responsible' for the management of the [agency he served]." 99-ORD-137, p. 8. Accordingly, the Hardin County Schools did not violate the Open Records Act in denying Ms. Berkshire's request for Mr. Connelly's performance evaluation and related documentation on the basis of KRS 61.878(1)(a).

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Footnotes

Footnotes

1 As long recognized by the Attorney General, a public agency cannot produce for inspection or copying records which do not exist; the agency discharges its duty under the Open Records Act by affirmatively indicating as much in a timely written response like the Hardin County Schools did here. See 04-ORD-069.

2 40 KAR 1:030 Section 6 provides: "Moot complaints. If requested documents are made available to the complaining party after a complaint is made, the Attorney General shall decline to issue a decision in the matter." In applying this mandate, the Attorney General has consistently held that when access to public records is initially denied but subsequently granted, "the propriety of the initial denial becomes moot. " 04-ORD-046, p. 5, citing OAG 91-140.

3 Given our resolution of the issue relative to KRS 61.878(1)(a), consideration of this argument is unnecessary.

2005

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 246

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 201

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 245

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 9

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 308

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 200

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 292

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 199

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 178

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 32

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 291

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 69

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 68

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 67

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 244

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 198

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 307

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 66

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 243

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 306

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 197

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 290

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 31

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 8

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 219

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 305

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 30

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 242

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 218

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 196

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 217

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 195

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 65

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 194

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 63

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 64

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 62

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 264

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 193

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 304

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 216

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 192

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 61

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 263

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 191

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 190

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 98

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 7

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 60

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 111

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 215

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 289

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 163

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 164

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 59

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 288

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 29

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 58

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 57

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 261

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 262

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 189

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 256

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 28

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 97

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 260

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 286

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 287

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 56

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 303

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 285

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 55

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 162

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 96

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 302

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 54

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 255

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 53

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 27

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 115

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 284

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 74

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 161

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 259

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 283

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 301

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 52

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 26

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 254

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 95

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 51

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 94

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 300

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 282

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 160

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 146

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 50

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 93

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 92

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 258

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 49

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 188

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 299

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 48

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 281

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 177

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 174

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 241

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 91

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 90

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 187

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 280

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 186

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 231

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 47

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 25

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 173

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 73

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 185

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 279

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 46

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 138

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 165

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 214

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 89

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 45

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 159

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 88

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 114

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 87

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 278

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 230

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 240

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 127

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 253

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 44

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 213

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 43

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 6

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 135

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 229

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 24

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 172

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 5

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 277

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 42

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 265

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 41

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 252

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 134

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 171

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 40

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 158

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 86

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 39

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 157

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 85

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 156

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 276

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 275

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 133

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 155

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 170

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 4

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 137

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 251

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 38

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 84

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 72

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 37

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 126

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 274

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 273

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 83

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 298

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 257

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 82

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 36

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 154

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 184

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 239

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 107

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 228

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 153

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 227

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 35

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 110

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 272

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 139

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 212

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 226

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 176

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 211

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 297

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 183

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 237

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 238

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 145

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 210

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 106

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 33

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 235

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 236

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 209

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 175

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 108

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 233

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 234

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 101

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 208

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 224

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 207

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 225

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 182

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 296

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 181

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 295

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 102

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 206

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 205

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 294

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 103

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 109

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 222

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 223

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 100

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 180

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 221

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 204

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 105

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 179

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 232

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 202

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 271

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 203

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 99

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 293

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 132

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 3

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 169

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 270

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 131

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 11

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 269

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 81

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 168

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 116

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 136

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 80

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 113

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 23

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 130

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 152

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 71

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 129

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 143

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 128

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 250

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 79

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 144

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 140

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 142

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 167

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 78

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 268

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 249

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 248

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 151

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 150

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 77

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 141

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 247

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 112

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 267

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 166

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 70

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 76

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 149

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 75

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 104

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 220

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 34

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 148

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 266

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 2

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 22

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 147

2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 1

Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.