OAG 85-68 is mentioned in the decision but not for a specific legal principle or precedent. It appears to be cited in error or as a typographical mistake, as it does not contribute to the legal reasoning or findings of the decision.
OAG 85-68 was N by OAG 89-43
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.