Skip to main content
OAG 78-365 is cited to support the principle that a board member or their spouse may not have a contractual or other financial relationship with the school board where school funds are expended. This previous opinion is used to affirm the current decision that the spouse of a school board member-elect should not receive payments for medical services from school funds, as it would constitute a conflict of interest under KRS 160.180.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Cited
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.