The Kentucky Attorney General issued the following open records decision last week:
"1. 20-ORD-166 (In re: Jessica Cheatham/City of Danville)
Summary: City of Danville violated the Open Records Act when it denied a request for payroll change forms on the grounds of personal privacy.
https://ag.ky.gov/Priorities/Government-Transparency/orom/2020/20-ORD-1…
2. 20-ORD-167 (In re: Mary A. Delaney/Jefferson County Circuit Court, Family Court Division)
Summary: The Open Records Act does not apply to records of the Jefferson County Family Court.
https://ag.ky.gov/Priorities/Government-Transparency/orom/2020/20-ORD-1…
3. 20-ORD-168 (In re: WKMS/Murray Police Department)
Summary: The Murray Police Department violated the Open Records Act when it denied a request to inspect records pertaining to a specific investigation. In particular, the Department failed to explain the harm that would result from premature disclosure of the records.
https://ag.ky.gov/Priorities/Government-Transparency/orom/2020/20-ORD-1…
4. 20-ORD-169 (In re: Yvonne Miles/City of Audubon Park)
Summary: City of Audubon Park did not violate the Open Records Act when it provided all the records it possessed in response to a request.
https://ag.ky.gov/Priorities/Government-Transparency/orom/2020/20-ORD-1…
5. 20-ORD-170 (In re: Laterrence Neal/Little Sandy Correctional Complex)
Summary: The Little Sandy Correctional Complex did not violate the Open Records Act when it denied a request for a record that did not exist. The Complex discharged its duty under the Act when it provided a written explanation for the nonexistence of the record in response to Appellant's prima facie showing that such a record was created.
https://ag.ky.gov/Priorities/Government-Transparency/orom/2020/20-ORD-1…
