23-ORD-180 is cited to support the principle that an agency must provide clear and convincing evidence that a requester intended to disrupt its essential functions by making repeated requests, or that the request is unreasonably burdensome, in order to deny a request on the basis that it had previously been granted. The decision in 24-ORD-135 uses this citation to explain why the Louisville Regional Airport Authority's initial denial of the request based on previous provision of the records was not justified under the Open Records Act.
23-ORD-180 was Followed by 24-ORD-135
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.