This citation is used to support the principle that a requester's mere assertion that an agency possesses additional records is insufficient to establish a prima facie case that the agency actually possesses them. The decision cites this case to affirm that the Cabinet did not violate the Open Records Act as the appellant did not provide evidence beyond his assertion.
22-ORD-040 was Cited by 24-ORD-132
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.