96-ORD-193 is cited similarly to 15-ORD-015, as an example where multiple requests alone did not suffice to demonstrate intent to disrupt, reinforcing the decision's requirement for clear and convincing evidence of disruptive intent.
96-ORD-193 was Followed by 24-ORD-085
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.