22-OMD-177 is cited to support the procedural requirement that a complaint under the Open Meetings Act must be submitted to the presiding officer of the public agency accused of violating the Act. The decision in 22-OMD-177 dismissed a complaint for failing to meet this requirement, which is paralleled in the current decision, 24-OMD-133, where the complaint was similarly dismissed for not being submitted to the correct official.
22-OMD-177 was Followed by 24-OMD-133
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.