Skip to main content

23-ORD-247

September 15, 2023

In re: Mark Graham/Christian County Board of Education

Summary: The Office cannot find that the Christian County Board of
Education (“the Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”)
because the Office cannot resolve the factual disputes between the
parties.

Open Records Decision

On August 9, 2023, Mark Graham (“Appellant”) submitted a request for
records to the Board. On August 17, 2023, having received no response from the
Board, the Appellant initiated this appeal.

Under KRS 61.880(1), upon receiving a request for records under the Act, a
public agency “shall determine within five (5) [business] days . . . after the receipt of
any such request whether to comply with the request and shall notify in writing the
person making the request, within the five (5) day period, of its decision.” Here, the
Appellant claims he submitted a request to the Board on August 9, 2023, and that it
did not respond to his request. On appeal, the Board claims that, on August 9, 2023,
it received a similar but different request from the Appellant and that it issued a
timely response to that request on August 16, 2023. As proof, the Board provides a
copies of the Appellant’s August 9 request and its August 16 response.

The Office has previously found that it is unable to resolve factual disputes
between a requester and a public agency. See, e.g., 23-ORD-192 (dispute as to whether
a requester received a response to his request); 23-ORD-071 (dispute as to whether a
public agency received a request). The Appellant claims he submitted a request to theBoard and it did not respond to that request. In contrast, the Board claims it did not
respond to that request because it did not receive it, but nevertheless timely
responded to a similar request. Accordingly, the Office cannot find that the Board
violated the Act because the Office cannot resolve the factual disputes between the
parties.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating an action in the
appropriate circuit court under KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days from
the date of this decision. Under KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified
of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in
any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of the complaint
emailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Daniel Cameron

Attorney General

s/ Matthew Ray

Matthew Ray

Assistant Attorney General

#354

Distributed to:

Mark Graham
Josh Hunt
Christopher Bentzel
Jack N. Lackey, Jr.

Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Mark Graham
Agency:
Christian County Board of Education
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.