Skip to main content

23-ORD-035

February 16, 2023

In re: Woodrow Lawson, Jr./Williamsburg Police Department

Summary: This Office cannot find that the Williamsburg Police
Department (“the Department”) failed to issue a timely response to a
request under the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it claims it did not
receive that request.

Open Records Decision

On January 4, 2023, inmate Woodrow Lawson, Jr. (“Appellant”) submitted a
request for records to the Department for “phone logs and chain of custody on
evidence,” as well as “all reports done by the Kentucky State Police Crime Lab”
related to a specific criminal case. On January 10, 2023, having received no further
response from the Department, the Appellant initiated this appeal.

When an agency receives a request under the Act, it “shall determine within
five (5) [business] days . . . after the receipt of any such request whether to comply
with the request and shall notify in writing the person making the request, within
the five (5) day period, of its decision.” KRS 61.880(1) (emphasis added).

Here, the Appellant claims he submitted his request on January 4, 2023, but
the Department never responded to it. However, on appeal, the Department explains
that it did not respond to the Appellant’s request because it never received it.1 The
Office has routinely found it is unable to resolve factual disputes between parties,

1
Although the Department receives mail at both its street address and a post office box, it notes the
address to which the Appellant’s request was sent does not match either of these addresses.such as whether an agency received a request to inspect records. See, e.g., 22-ORD-
216;
22-ORD-148,
22-ORD-125;
22-ORD-100;
22-ORD-051;
21-ORD-163.
Consequently, this Office is unable to find that the Department violated the Act.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the
appropriate circuit court under KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days from
the date of this decision. Under KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified
of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in
any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of the complaint
emailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Daniel Cameron

Attorney General

s/ Matthew Ray

Matthew Ray

Assistant Attorney General

#025

Distributed to:

Woodrow Lawson, Jr., #219717
Jason Caddell

LLM Summary
In 23-ORD-035, the Attorney General's Office determined that it could not find the Williamsburg Police Department in violation of the Open Records Act for failing to respond to a records request, as the Department claimed it never received the request. The decision cites previous ORD decisions to support the principle that the Office cannot resolve factual disputes about whether an agency received a request.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Woodrow Lawson, Jr.
Agency:
Williamsburg Police Department
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.