17-OMD-208 is cited to draw a parallel between the current case and a previous case where discussions by a city council, under the authority of the city manager and without needing council approval, were found not to violate the Open Meetings Act. This precedent supports the decision that the Fiscal Court did not violate the Act as the discussions were within the authority of the Road Foreman.
17-OMD-208 was Followed by 23-OMD-267
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.