20-ORD-175 is cited to support the principle that an appeal brought solely on preliminary correspondence from a public agency, which is meant to facilitate a request before the expiration of the time for the agency to respond, does not constitute a 'denial' capable of review by the Office. This citation is used to explain that the Coordinator's Office's initial response was not a final denial and thus the appeal was premature.
20-ORD-175 was Followed by 21-ORD-253
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.