96-ORD-232 is discussed in the context of its approach to balancing public interest against privacy concerns regarding demographic information. The decision notes that this Office previously did not accept a categorical rule protecting race information under KRS 61.878(1)(a) and instead applied a balancing test based on specific facts.
96-ORD-232 was Cited by 21-ORD-048
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.