Skip to main content
20-ORD-031 is cited to support the decision that a public agency is not required to produce redacted records when the request specifically identifies the person to which the records relate, as redaction in such cases would be futile. This precedent is used to justify the denial of the appellant's request for tax receipts of a specific company, arguing that redaction would not prevent the revelation of the company's business affairs.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Cited
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.