02-OMD-206 is cited by the U of L Board in their defense, arguing that the presence of a board member via videoconference does not convert an in-person meeting into a video teleconference meeting. The decision discusses this citation to clarify the conditions under which videoconferencing can be used according to the Open Meetings Act, ultimately finding that the U of L Board's interpretation was incorrect.
02-OMD-206 was Cited by 18-OMD-025
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.