16-ORD-084 is cited and adopted as the basis for reasoning in the current decision. It discusses a similar situation where KSP failed to meet the burden of proof required under the Open Records Act by not specifying the harm that would be caused by releasing records or justifying the refusal of inspection with specificity. The current decision follows this reasoning and applies it to the present case.
16-ORD-084 was Followed by 17-ORD-046
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.