In 96-ORD-205, the decision discusses the withholding of records related to a notice of violation issued to a steel coke plant, emphasizing that disclosure of such communications would inhibit the free flow of information within the Cabinet. This rationale is applied to the current case to support the nondisclosure of similar preliminary communications, thus following the reasoning established in 96-ORD-205.
96-ORD-205 was Followed by 14-ORD-014
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.