14-OMD-020 is cited in the decision to illustrate a precedent where the Attorney General found that a city commission did not make adequate provision for the public's convenience during a closed session, as they had to wait outdoors in a parking lot during December. This case is used to contrast with the current situation, where the fiscal court did provide an indoor waiting area, albeit with limited seating and no air conditioning. The decision uses 14-OMD-020 to establish the requirement for reasonable accommodation of the public during closed sessions and to highlight that the current case did not violate the Open Meetings Act as the previous case did.
14-OMD-020 was Cited by 14-OMD-182
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.