Skip to main content
01-OMD-175 is cited to support the principle that meeting agendas should be drafted with sufficient specificity to ensure fair notice to the public. The decision discusses how vague descriptions of agenda items, as seen in the case at hand, do not provide the public with adequate notice of the matters to be discussed, which is inconsistent with the goals of the Open Meetings Act.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Cited
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.