Skip to main content
This citation is used to support the argument that the custodian of the records must be a public agency and the documents to be inspected must be public records as defined in KRS 61.870(2). The decision follows the reasoning established in OAG 82-27 regarding the legal thresholds for compelling access to documents under the Open Records Law.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Followed
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.