In 11-OMD-129, the Attorney General addressed a similar complaint regarding the frequency of special meetings held by a fiscal court, concluding that the mere frequency of special meetings was not sufficient to establish a violation of the Open Meetings Act without proof of intent to avoid public scrutiny. This prior decision is cited in 13-OMD-204 to support the conclusion that the frequency of special meetings in 2013, as complained by Mr. Cron, does not constitute a violation of the Open Meetings Act, following the same reasoning and conclusion.
11-OMD-129 was Followed by 13-OMD-204
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.