In the decision 13-OMD-155, the Attorney General cites 13-OMD-081 to maintain consistency in handling cases where the complainant fails to identify a specific meeting date on which a violation of the Open Meetings Act occurred. The previous decision, 13-OMD-081, set a precedent that without specific details of the alleged violation, the complaint is considered deficient and not ripe for review. This rationale is directly adopted in the current decision to dismiss a similar complaint.
13-OMD-081 was Followed by 13-OMD-155
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.