03-ORD-040 was cited by KACo's General Counsel to support the argument that a requesting party must identify documents with 'reasonable particularity'. However, this decision rejects that position, stating it no longer represents an accurate statement of law following the Supreme Court's ruling in Commonwealth v. Chestnut.
03-ORD-040 was Cited by 12-ORD-082
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.