02-ORD-103 is cited to support the decision that the names of clients represented by a named DPA attorney do not violate confidentiality or privacy, as the existence of the attorney-client relationship in a public court setting does not expect confidentiality. This previous decision is used to argue against DPA's current stance of treating such information as confidential.
02-ORD-103 was Followed by 12-ORD-028
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.