11-ORD-113 is referenced in a comparison regarding the handling of evidence in ongoing criminal cases. The current decision mentions 11-ORD-113 to highlight that JCPS did not provide sufficient proof that the videotape was considered primary evidence in an ongoing criminal case, which would necessitate withholding it under KRS 61.878(1)(h).
11-ORD-113 was Cited by 11-ORD-106
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.