Skip to main content
01-ORD-153 is cited to illustrate a precedent where reliance on a similar statutory provision to deny access to records was deemed improper because the records were generated by the public entity itself, not confidentially disclosed to it. This supports the decision's argument that attorney billing records, similarly generated by attorneys and not confidentially disclosed, do not meet the criteria for nondisclosure under the cited statute.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Cited
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.