97-ORD-183 is cited to support the argument that the visualizations presented at the visioning session were not drafts, notes, or preliminary recommendations, and therefore not exempt from disclosure under KRS 61.878(1)(i) and (j). The decision uses the reasoning from 97-ORD-183 to clarify the applicability of these exemptions.
97-ORD-183 was Cited by 10-ORD-151
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.