Skip to main content
01-OMD-175 is cited in the decision to justify the refusal to provide an advisory opinion on open records issues outside of a formal appeal. It draws a parallel to the policy adopted in open meetings contexts, emphasizing the quasi-adjudicative role of the Attorney General and the prohibition against rendering advisory opinions.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Cited
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.