This citation is used to support the principle that the press of business or the absence of the official custodian does not justify an untimely delay in providing public records. The decision cites this case to affirm that the city's response to the records request was insufficient and did not meet the required standards.
96-ORD-238 was Followed by 08-ORD-240
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.