Skip to main content
This citation is used to support the decision that public agencies must bear the cost of redaction when separating confidential from non-confidential information in public records. The decision follows the reasoning and conclusions of 95-ORD-082, which held that a public agency could not assess a charge for redacting excepted information from an otherwise non-excepted record.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Followed
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.