96-ORD-193 is cited to support the argument that repeated requests alone do not constitute harassment or an intent to disrupt the essential functions of a public agency, aligning with the decision's conclusion that the agency did not meet the burden of proof required to deny an open records request on these grounds.
96-ORD-193 was Cited by 08-ORD-167
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.