This citation is used to support the argument that multiple requests to a public agency do not necessarily indicate an intent to disrupt essential functions, unless there is clear and convincing evidence to the contrary. The decision cites this case to emphasize that a commitment to monitoring agency activities through multiple requests is not inherently disruptive.
94-ORD-086 was Cited by 07-ORD-057
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.