Skip to main content
05-ORD-224 is cited in the decision to support the argument that public figures have a diminished privacy interest, and thus, the public's interest in disclosure is heightened. This decision is used to argue against the Division's reliance on KRS 61.878(1)(a) for redaction of the suspect's identity, emphasizing that the suspect's status as a public figure and the public interest in the investigation outweigh the privacy concerns.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Followed
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.