96-ORD-135 is cited to discuss a similar case where the public agency failed to meet its burden of proof under KRS 61.878(1)(c)1, and to draw parallels with the current case regarding the requirements for withholding records as confidential or proprietary.
96-ORD-135 was Cited by 04-ORD-175
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.