Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find the Northpoint Training Center properly relied upon KRS 197.025(1), incorporated into the Open Records Act by operation of KRS 61.878(1)(l), and KRS 61.878(4), in masking a portion of Mr. Mattingly's request for a copy of his Record of Interviews.

KRS 197.025(1) provides that no person, including any inmate under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections, shall have access to any records if the disclosure is deemed by the commissioner of the department or his designee to constitute a threat to the security of the inmate, any other inmate, correctional staff, the institution, or any other person.

KRS 61.878(4) provides: "[i]f any public record contains material which is not excepted under this section, the public agency shall separate the excepted and make the nonexcepted material available for examination."

Mr. Mattingly was provided a copy of the records he requested with some of the information, such as names, numbers, and addresses masked, upon a determination that disclosure of the redacted information would constitute a threat to the security of the inmate, any other inmate, or the facility. We believe that 97-ORD-134, and in particular the discussion at pages one through three of that decision is controlling. A copy of the decision is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The Attorney General's decision supports the Northpoint Training Center's action of masking portions of Mr. Mattingly's Record of Interviews under KRS 197.025(1) and KRS 61.878(4). The decision follows the precedent set by 97-ORD-134, which discusses the balance between public record access and security concerns, and is directly applied to justify the redactions made in the provided records.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Anthony Mattingly
Agency:
Northpoint Training Center
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2002 Ky. AG LEXIS 21
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.