94-ORD-056 is cited to distinguish the current case from a previous decision where the denial of a request for a tape recording was affirmed due to an ongoing investigation. The decision explains that the circumstances and details of the two cases are different, leading to a different conclusion in the current case.
94-ORD-056 was Cited by 00-ORD-196
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.