This citation is used to support the decision's conclusion that correspondence related to the administration of a public contract cannot be exempt from disclosure under KRS 61.878(1)(i). The decision follows the reasoning in 94-ORD-027, which involved correspondence from a private provider contracted with the state.
94-ORD-027 was Followed by 00-ORD-098
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.