The decision cites 96-ORD-106 as controlling in determining that the Commonwealth's Attorney for the Second Judicial District did not violate the Open Records Act by denying access to certain records based on KRS 61.878(1)(h). This indicates that the reasoning and conclusions of 96-ORD-106 were followed in reaching the decision in the current case.
96-ORD-106 was Followed by 98-ORD-195
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.