The decision cites 98-ORD-048 as controlling precedent for the violation of KRS 61.880(1) by the Office of the Bath County Judge/Executive in failing to respond timely to an open records request. It uses the reasoning and conclusions from 98-ORD-048 to determine the outcome of the current case.
98-ORD-048 was Followed by 98-ORD-050
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.