96-OMD-264 is cited to support the assertion that public agencies have considerable latitude in scheduling their meetings, and that no agency has been found to intentionally schedule a meeting at an inconvenient time for the public. This citation is used to justify the decision that the Board did not violate the Open Meetings Act by scheduling meetings at times that might not have been universally convenient.
96-OMD-264 was Cited by 98-OMD-075
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.