Skip to main content
In 95-OMD-092, the Attorney General decided that a violation of the Open Meetings Act occurred when board members took action in a location other than the designated meeting site without changing the meeting site officially. This previous decision is cited in the current decision to contrast with the current situation where the meeting site was officially moved, thus all actions should have occurred at the new location, the school library. The current decision uses the reasoning from 95-OMD-092 to support the conclusion that once a meeting site is officially moved, it should remain the site for all subsequent actions.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Target:
Treatment:
Cited
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.