95-ORD-082 is cited in 97-ORD-092 to support the decision that separating excepted material from non-excepted material in public records is not equivalent to producing a record in a specially tailored or nonstandardized format, for which an agency can recover staff costs. This citation is used to clarify the responsibilities of a public agency under KRS 61.878(4) and to affirm that the agency must bear the cost of redacting excepted material.
95-ORD-082 was Followed by 97-ORD-092
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.